At least in America, Kyoto is perceived as the cultural heart of Japan, and the inevitable goal of any trip to the country; it’s the nation’s Rome or Paris, with a long and illustrious history that gives its citizens and nation pride and provides an incredible abundance of things for domestic and international visitors to see. Someone once told me that the least site in Rome would be the main attraction anywhere else; that observation would apply to Kyoto nicely.
Osaka is conveniently only a few dollars and half an hour away from Kyoto by that pervasive transportation means the train, so I planned from the start to make frequent hops over to the city for some quality time before visiting on more dedicated stints. My first such day trip took place during the 5-day weekend you’re already familiar with if you’re up to date, the day after my trip to Nara with coworkers.
To fill in newcomers, a 5-day weekend is ironically a terrible time to travel because of the hordes of others who do the same. Japanese businesspeople don’t get much time off, just two weeks of the year and everyone at the same time, and Japanese people by and large seem to love to travel within the country and without, so an unusual confluence of 3 holidays to form a 5-day weekend is a call for mass exodus to the cultural centers of the country.
With this in mind I decided that I would try to visit those sites in the city, of which there are countless, that are not the central draws. The main attraction to foreign and domestic visitors is the forests of Higashiyama, which are filled with priceless temples built or further developed during Kyoto’s heyday as the capitol of Tokugawa Japan. In that time temples were generally segregated into discrete regions outside the city due to Tokugawa Ieyasu’s and many of his descendant’s fears of the power of various Buddhist sects. As a result, the forests of the mountains immediately east of Kyoto are rife with cultural treasures and irreplaceable experiences (and UNESCO agrees, making the whole lot a world heritage site). So I avoided the region for this particular visit; I certainly intended to return and felt that there was more to the experience that might be marred by the throng of visitors than just seeing the temples. Reading my post on Himeji (following this one) I think you’ll understand the distinction I’m getting at.
I also sought to avoid the major sites frequented by mostly domestic travelers (to be honest, having taken a few trips around the country now I can say that there are far, far more domestic tourists than foreigners. In fact, for the most part there are not that many white tourists, although it is probably worse in the spring and summer, and those that there are are mostly Australians…), like Kinkaku-ji and Tenryu-ji (although having a bit extra time I did end up going to Tenryu-ji late in the afternoon, just before closing).
So I saw three sites in Kyoto on this little trip and was handsomely rewarded for my choices, but before I get to that a couple observations on the city itself. First, Kyoto is blessed in its surroundings. The city is bordered (and its growth constrained) by gorgeous, forested mountains. The city of course is not right out of a Kurosawa film, it has modernized and the bulk of the city is urban Japan like anywhere else. Nevertheless, the roots of the city are still apparent in the countless little locations that have maintained the feel of a long and enduring history, and the undeveloped mountains are stunning, like nearly every nameless range you roll through on the train in this country, with all the businessmen paying no nevermind to the awe inspiring vistas of rain clouds lifting up like a fog over mountains carpeted with dewy pines (I’m on the train to Tokyo right now, and that’s exactly what’s going down). Japan amazes me in its ability to maintain majestic natural beauty and relentlessly modern urbanism in close proximity. I should say that such temples and shrines and gardens are not merely holdovers from a bygone era, to be wondered at with a degree of romanticism (Himeji-jo is closer to that), these are locations that embody what life in Japan was like for millennia and what forms the core of Japanese life today. Shrines and temples are used and prayed at, and the interior of many modern homes look not unlike their ancient ancestors. A family trip to Koto-in is to relax under the bamboo shoots, not to revel at an ancient and lost way of life. Japan like every nation of the world has gone through considerable change over its history, especially in the modern era, but it is important to remember that this country was largely isolated for an extremely long period of time, and totally isolated for 250 years from 1600 on; I suspect that the close ties of even today’s everyday-Japan with the cultures, traditions, and lifestyle of the previous millenium is a consequence of this domestic-centric evolution of the nation. For example, temples built in the last millennium have been renovated every hundred years or so since, but every new construction has been an exact replica of the previous structure, just replacing old wood, paint, ornamentation, etc.. In fact to the untrained eye (or the average Japanese person) the changes in architectural style over the last millennium are unnoticeable, especially when compared to other variations (religious sect, regional culture, etc.).
Anyway, getting to the point, here’s how the day went. Everything said and done I didn’t roll into Kyoto station until around 11. At that point I’d read up on all the sites in Kyoto but had still made no decisions on what I was going to see, so I stopped by a café and got a cup of coffee to mull over my options. I already had an idea of what would be too busy on that day, and I had already figured what sites I wanted to see, so it was only a few minutes before I picked a circuit that looked promising.
On transportation, while many large Japanese cities thrive on an extensive and efficient subway system, Kyoto’s native underground is insufficient to handle the mass of visitors, and as a consequence an effective bus system has been developed. I highly recommend that any visitors to Kyoto get a bus day pass, it’s only 5 bucks, you take the bus everywhere, and if you don’t buy it (like me) then you pay 2 bucks every ride, which adds up fast when you have to change here or there. In either case, my first stop was way up in the northern portion of Kyoto, 30m by bus, Shimogamo Jinja. Jinja denotes shrine, not –ji which indicates a temple (Otera). I planned to make a walking circuit from there a bit north to Kyoto’s botanical gardens, then west to the Daitoku-ji temple complex. Didn’t go exactly according to plan but what does.
In either case I arrived at Shimagamo Jinja to find an interesting crowd. Mostly it was locals coming to enjoy the public park and make a quick ring of the bell and double clap at the shrine for good luck. As I said, the shrines and temples of this nation are very much ‘lived in’ in the sense that you get businessmen stopping by after work, families swinging in while out for a walk, etc. In this case there was also a wedding going on, or at least a crowd of people from a wedding and a wedding photographer.
(A note on the vids, you may notice that the height is strange and the balance terrible, it’s because I hold the cam at chest height so as to attempt to attract the least amount of attention, that being relative of course)
On that note Christian weddings are very big here. It’s not like anyone’s Christian, it’s just that Christian weddings with the white dress in a church are very popular right now. That ties into the Japanese perception of religion in general, which I don’t have time to get into now but I find very appealing. I’ll probably comment on it further at some later point.
Anyway, Shimogamo Jinja was nice, the buildings are modern-ish, rebuilt every couple hundred years as exact reproductions of the original design in the 10th century or somewhere abouts, so the compound has an interesting feel to it being well-kept and ancient at the same time. There’s not much to say on it, take a look at the pics (as a reminder, clicking on any photos in the blog will bring you to relevant flickr sets or collections).
I walked about the grounds’ several shrines, picked a big one, tossed my coin in, rang the bell, took my bow and made my claps (I’ve been surprised, by the way, at how hard it is to control the sound of a symmetrical clap). The grounds were pleasant enough with many well-kept shrines, including a river one set in a little creek, and all told the place was a nice experience. The park outside the shrine gates is also good for a stroll, but on the whole I’d say Shimogamo Jinja, Sumiyoshi Taisha, and most shrines in common use I’ve seen are pretty much the same deal. Nice to visit if you’re in the city, stop by from time to time if you live there, but never worth a trip in itself.
Daitoku-ji, by contrast, is unquestionably worth putting forth time and effort to visit. Before getting there however, I had some ideas and a plan. As I mentioned, I was going to head up northwest by foot to the botanical gardens and then cut west to Daitoku-ji, about 20 minutes each leg (heh, pun). If you’ve read my comments in an early post on getting around Japanese cities, however, you can guess where this is going. My map had only nominal coverage of the area I was in, with no street names and only a few major roads and the river indicated. Still, the botanical gardens were along the river to the north, so how hard could it be to find? Well when I stopped by a real estate agency to ask directions and they had no idea, I knew there might be a problem. I worked my way west until I hit the river, but much to my chagrin found that there were in fact 2 rivers that forked, and which of them was the one on my map was impossible to discern. Using the general orientations of the roads on the map would have worked nicely in any other country, but that’s not how the Japanese roll. You see, maps in Japan like to have straight lines, but roads in Japan like to curve and wander. As you might imagine, this poses some very pragmatic issues. Angles and distances on maps are more of a rough approximation than actually useful representations. Additionally, ‘major roads’ are a loose definition, and without proper name indications on maps, roads, or both the roads that are on the map are indistinguishable from those not shown. This all really frustrates me because I love maps, I love the sense of a place they give me, with the ability to organize disparate locations into a cohesive picture and infer the spatial relations between things. So after asking a jogger where the place was and having them point me west which I knew was wrong, I said fuck it and made my way west to Daitoku-ji with a few more requests for directions and a street vendor’s okonomiyaki.
So, Daitoku-ji. Again, pictures speak a thousand words and I’ve got movies up as well, so to get an idea of what the place is (but not really what it’s like) those’ll do a better job than I can. Still, I’m not using a nice Nikon DSLR or my old OM-2 film SLR, so despite my best efforts the P&S images, with their low dynamic range, can’t do much to capture a sense of these places. I really don’t think they can take you there. Even so, they should provide some context for what I present.
Anyway, Daitoku-ji is a temple complex consisting of hundreds of small temple grounds, the vast majority of which are not open to the public. The main arteries feature some nice wide pebble roads with slab stone footpaths that take you around the grounds. You can pop into temples that are open to visitors and appreciate the gardens or temple proper, often with calligraphic works, stone sculptures, bonsai, flowers, or other effects that are appropriate for the scene. That is the central concept in each of these temples, a cohesive atmosphere generated by the convergence of a thousand unnoticed subtleties. Experiencing those gardens and temples is just like looking at a powerful masterpiece painting that transports you to an experience or emotion. The contrast between the carefully but naturally crafted environments and mere copies on their theme is stark and obvious, as I’ll describe in my next post on Himeji’s Kokoen gardens. All of this sensation culminated at the last temple I visited, Koto-in, set in a small bamboo forest.
It was here I found myself enjoying the soft rustle of bamboo shoots in the wind on the porch of a quiet temple room opened up to the gardens, sitting alongside others who had come to while away some time in the shade. Again it was families, businessmen, teenage couples. People looking for neither a spiritual venture or a tourist spectacle, just a quiet afternoon in a place where they feel perfectly natural and at home.
Needless to say, I had found something at Daitoku-ji that I would compare many past and coming experiences to. The bottom line is that while some temples, like Daibutsu-den in Nara, are sites to be seen, many are experiences to be indulged in and should be ventured on, if possible, at times when things are quiet and you can take them in at your leisure. I’ll be happy to return to Kyoto and other locales in the winter when I finish at DA.
Once I had finished at Koto-in it was about 4PM so catching any more temples before the usual 4:30 closing was seeming unlikely. Still, the big and famous Tenryu-ji in Arashiyama (the mountain-temple region of northwestern Kyoto) was open til 6:30 so I thought I’d give that a go. 30 minutes and two buses later I was among the throng of visitors at the thick tourist shopping area by the bus stop at Tenryu-ji. Fortunately, as I made my way up the path to the temple grounds I found I was moving against the grain, with most people working their way back to wherever is home.
There were a variety of walled Buddhist compounds, silent and nameless, along the way with a few doors slightly ajar. When I arrived at the at the renowned temple I found two entrances, one to the interior and one to the garden. I had about an hour before closing so I figured I’d hit both, starting with the garden because that’s always what you’re there to see.
If it isn’t clear by now, a Japanese garden is more of a small dense park than what we usually describe as gardens in the western world. These ‘gardens’ as I call them from an ignorance of the English language are much more arboreal and generally on a more human scale. They’re crafted of stone and wood and water. Their density, even though they never feel too busy or chaotic, is such that you can become entirely removed just feet away from a busy street. This is of course the ideal situation, and while it isn’t always met Koto-in and Tenryu-ji certainly deliver.
Tenryu-ji’s grounds are fairly large with everything from small ponds and waterfalls to muse over to grand mountain vistas to be awed by. So I took an intensely pleasant stroll through the grounds in the fading light and then moved on to the temple proper, which is really just a series of porches and pathways from which to enjoy the grounds, but must be separate as that area, however exposed, is ‘indoors,’ as opposed to ‘outdoors.’ In most situations and certainly in structural ones that distinction is definitively made in Japanese culture.
As the compound is on the eastern slope of the mountain the setting sun was masked which gave the last half hour a real dusky grey light which, coupled with a cool breeze lifting the heat, gave me my second utterly relaxing and contemplative experience that day.
It’s hard to know what confluence of forces put me in that precise mindset at those precise moments, but if it is purely the temples doing it, I can see why people become monks. It is a static joy you feel, a place where you’re certainly not bored and certainly not anxious. You’re happy and you really don’t mind staying even if you’re just sitting there. All told though, the most I’ve been like that is an hour before having to pack up and go, so how long the sensation lasts I don’t know.
So there you have my first venture to Kyoto, I think you’ll find the following trip to Himeji provides some interesting contrasts.
As a post-script, sorry for popping in and out of past tense, it’s what happens when you write posts weeks after the fact, adding retrospective commentary to a present-tense commentary. Plus I’ve got no time to properly edit so you’ll have to deal with it. Really I should just write all the posts from a future perspective, but hey, I write them at a lot of different times in a lot of different places so consistency hasn’t been big. Most of the posts so far haven’t been written as a single whole, I just write things from time to time in different places, not even about consecutive events, and then try and fit them all together into something mildly cohesive.





























