Sorry it’s been some time since I’ve posted, my last week in Osaka and first week in Tokyo were busy as hell, although I question how busy hell would be since they’d have pretty much all of eternity to sort their business out. To carry on with Kanazawa, I’ll start by talking about the parks/gardens I visited there: Kenroku-en and Genryu-en. Also updated the last post with new pics btw.
Kenroku-en is the highlight of Kanazawa; it’s the reason the city is famous in Japan and inevitably the first thing anyone here brings up when I mention I’ve been to the city. Kanazawa has more to offer in terms of sites of course, mostly in the form of museums, ranging the gamut from modern art to old samurai houses-turned-museum (that’ll be the focus of my next post).
Kenroku-en is a stunningly beautiful and quite expansive park. It is like what you’d imagine an ancient wondrous forest to be like, if it were a publicly accessible park hosting hundreds of visitors daily. You can probably see where this is going; its popularity does somewhat mar its atmosphere. It is not the crowds, since going at a proper time reduces those and the place is so massive it’s not a real issue. Rather, it is the additions to the park’s design meant to accommodate the potential hordes; the wide boulevards, gutters, and fencing. It is all very tastefully done, through stone and wood, and its modernness doesn’t detract from the place, but the size, convenience, and order of these measures stands in stark contrast to the park’s native design. I think these next two pics, of a new path and a long unused one, juxtapose the divergent purposes nicely. What Kenroku-en of today is not is it is not a carefully crafted forest of a park that you weave your way through to enjoy its many and varied natural beauties. It is also not a big public park like Kyoto’s imperial palace park (to come in a later post) or Osaka-jo’s park where kids play soccer and baseball, spectacle performers dazzle crowds and sell video tapes, and businessmen ride their bikes through to take the long way home from work. Instead, Kenroku-en is a park with all the care and subtlety of Daitoku-ji’s and Tenryu-ji’s gardens, but focused more on grandeur, with wide lakes and huge ancient trees. It reminds me a lot of the Boston public garden, but of course on steroids.
Genryu-en is the polar opposite, entirely equal in beauty and careful, skilled design, but nevertheless everything that Kenroku-en is not. Kenroku-en is a vast, grand park designed to awe many visitors and serve as a main attraction (although not through any lack of subtlety and intricacy). By contrast, Genryu-en, despite being a reasonably-sized garden (about the same as Koto-in’s in Kyoto, but far far smaller than Kenroku-en or Tentryu-ji’s garden), is neither well frequented nor designed to be so. There are no pebbled boulevards or bamboo fences, just the lone weathered stepping stones overgrown with moss. The pictures will hopefully tell the story (although like I’ve said before, the pictures don’t do any of these places much justice, the dynamic range is limited and the colors are muted, with more missing detail than you’d think, for example the tone of lighting is lost almost entirely indoors and out, and the vividness of lush greens amidst a slight haze is utterly undetectable in the photographs, shooting in RAW and doing my own post-processing would help, but where would that time come from?), but the look and feel of the garden is… indescribable with my limited vocabulary. It’s a similar experience to Koto-in and Tenryu-ji, but different in that there are so few visitors (as in maybe a dozen a day), even compared to the relatively low traffic of Koto-in; this has affected the manner of its growth. I will try to convey the sensation narratively where I’ve failed observationally. (The low visitor volume, by the way, is primarily due to the fact that Kanazawa is usually a day trip or day-and-a-half at most, and people generally don’t include Genryu-en in that itinerary, especially Japanese people, they tend to focus on other, actually famous locations. )

Genryu-en
The size of the garden is difficult to discern, as each time you turn a corner that you thought you had a solid view over, you find yourself in a new, entirely different 15-foot stretch of pathway; a great deal of new scenery is revealed. I think the best word is depth, there is a depth to your surroundings that gets deeper the harder you look. It’s like if you looked at an impressionist or pointist painting, where you are struck by the overall feel and experience it conveys to you despite the seeming lack of relationship between and the details (or lack thereof); only here, when you look much closer, instead of seeing big rough brush strokes that are mundane out of the context of the painting as a whole, you see an entirely new painting with a thousand indiscernible intricacies that somehow contributed to the work at large. Let’s take an example to show this isn’t entirely romanticism. Let’s say you look down at your feet. You see the rock you’re standing on. It’s about 3 feet across each way, it’s flat on first inspection but ruffled with curiously shaped bumps no doubt weathered down from sharp crystalline juts on stone fault lines, and this bumpy surface is on a slightly tilted plane your feet have already adjusted for. And there’s moss, covering the ground around the stone and creeping up on to it, unevenly in the depressed edges; but it’s not just homogenous green moss. It’s several kinds of moss and tiny plants or vines, but not fully intermixed rather in patchy domains wrapped around each other. It reminds me of one of impressionism’s tricks, using 2 colors side by side to give the mind the impression of a third color, which isn’t really a color defined by some specific hue but the sensation of a color invoked by the confluence of the 2 visually presented. It’s a complicated sensory phenomenon that I’ve only had anecdotal experience with, I don’t know if any formal research exists on the matter. Anyway, to continue, while you’re noticing the moss on your rock (which by the way points out to you the small unmossed dirt/mud patches in the moss quilt, whose origins are inexplicable, but add a brown to the palette of greens), you notice the roots. The roots of trees are protruding from the earth, some large some tiny, and breaking into the moss and in between the 6” to 1’ gaps from stepping stone to stone. Then there’s the barked and unbarked portions of the roots, and the mineral deposits on the rocks, and so on and so forth, and not just for what’s right below you but also everything around you. The point of all this is that no matter how deep you look there is just more and more remarkable detail in your surroundings; Like the most impressive masterpiece painting out there, all of the constituent parts combine to give you a whole much greater than the sum, a sense of the natural beauty and the joy and peace associated with that.
In either case, there’s depth. As I mentioned, let me try a couple brief narratives to get that across. Every aspect of these experiences is a consequence of the garden’s design. First, you’re taking a zig zag path that climbs a small cliff in the garden. Steps are formed by the roots of trees, which in preventing runoff have created dry mud plateaus with small boulders set in them to step on. The air is cool but windless and moist. You hear the pitter patter of running water but you can’t identify the source. You’re surrounded, even above and below, by greenery, but there are few tall trees. On your right is the cliff, it is grey and brown and green. Taking a few steps you realize the wider boulder ahead of you is crossing a small creek coming down the cliff. You continue a couple of steps more and discover a stone lantern, before turning to round the corner to find that you’ve reached the top, where you see to your right a bare mossy plateau about 10 feet across with another lantern, bordered by trees, and to your left another stone path leading along a small pond, the source of the creek.

Genryu-en (this isn't actually the place I just talked about, didn't take a pic of it, but it's close enough)
Second, you’re in a teahouse in the garden. Inside is comfy with the bare red paper walls and a soft tatami floor. There’s a scroll in front of you hanging on the wall, to your left is the edge of this porch, an open screen door providing you shade. Beyond this opening is the lush green and grey of the garden; a pond, pathways, and stone lanterns up the cliff are visible. To your right is a screen blocking the view of the host’s entrance to the room, from which she brings a warm, bitter cup of dry tea in a wide stone cup and 3 tiny, delicious candies on a gold-leafed ceramic plate topped with a sheet of watermarked rice paper. The candies are incredibly delicate, formed in curious shapes and speckled colors with a gradient consistency despite their small size.

Genryu-en, pic from inside the tea house. I should probably have left this to imagination, as the pic doesn't capture all that much for various fundamental reasons (see above).
Like I said, each aspect of those sorts of experiences, even the temperature, humidity, and level of wind, is a function of careful design born from a fundamental understanding of how nature behaves, how each of the natural components, the trees, stones, bushes, earth, etc, would behave.

Genryu-en

Genryu-en

Genryu-en, teahouse
Ultimately, to me, the parks and gardens of Japan, which both Kenroku-en and Genryu-en capture, remind me of what I think is the best possible interaction between humanity and nature, which believe it or not is epitomized in the American Lawn. Actual nature, removed from mankind, carries its natural beauty but is also filled with chaos and wildness, from things as simple as a lack of a way to cross a river, or the lack of trail in any untouched wood, to more fundamental aspects like sickly trees, overgrown areas, and dead animals. Mankind finds nature beautiful, but can refine it with his ability to intentionally manipulate the world around him, which makes nature more pleasurable and accommodating while maintaining the natural beauty that fascinates us (albeit sacrificing the wildness of nature that attracts many). Like I said, let’s take grass. In the wild, grass grows tall and nasty, brown in heat and smelly in damp, stinging you as you work through it and hiding all sorts of insect, animal, and the remnants of both. Man tempers this by choosing his grass and cropping it regularly, the simplest of operations lacking almost entirely in care and skill, but resulting in beautiful green lawns that are great to lie in, indulging in their softness and freshness. Kenroku-en and Genryu-en take this concept almost unimaginably further by the careful selection and control of nature. That is not to say that the nature in these gardens is hampered and confined greatly into neat little sections, that’d be missing the point, like one might imagine Bonsai to be like (the point and joy of Bonsai’s a little different, but not knowing that it might seem like so), just looking at the pictures should make this clear enough. Rather, it is the careful choice and cultivation of natural bodies like trees, moss, and coy, without sacrificing the beauty we love. For example, the design of a pond. It is a dirt pond and whatever lilies or coy or whatever you put in there will live and thrive as they will, but by choosing the design of the pond, its size and depths and shape and relation to surrounding features, like trees and an island or bridges or reeds, and doing so from a knowledge of how the flora and fauna and landmass you’ve introduced will behave, you can heighten the experience in the ways I’ve described. I don’t know where someone would learn such a craft, or if it even still exists (it seems to have been traditionally furthered over time mostly by monks, Buddhist and Shinto of different sects with different approaches, from at least AD1500 on). Anyway, that’s my poorly-conveyed thoughts on the matter, hopefully the pictures will tell you more, although like I mentioned earlier, there’s gross limitations to that.
As a post-script, too many photos in the post? Should I cut back in the future to just a couple representative images, and let you head to flickr to see the whole range?




















